All the objects of renovation are located in the city of Moscow, all belong to residential construction. Each of the renovation projects is subject to state expertise with special conditions and requirements set by the MFR. The renovation program is planned until 2032, started in 2017. Despite the fact that the program has been running for 4 years, few people know the specifics of passing the examination and the subtleties of the program itself. The Moscow Renovation Fund has its own requirements and conditions for the construction organization project, which must be taken into account by the designer and expert. Currently, passing the Moscow state examination of the objects of the renovation program takes more time than private projects. In order to understand why this happens, it is necessary to analyze the construction organization project to identify its weaknesses. By understanding where the most comments are received by the construction organization project manager, you can prevent these comments in advance by paying more attention to these points. To do this, in the article, the construction organization project was divided into 11 groups, for which we will identify in which part of the project the project organization receives the most comments. In order to identify for what reason and because of what most often the construction organization project receives a negative conclusion, it is necessary to divide the comments themselves into types. In the course of the analysis, in this article we will deduce the weaknesses of construction organization projects in the conditions of renovation.

Keywords: moscow State expertise, construction organization project, renovation, probability distribution, construction program

Renovation refers to the process of improvement, reconstruction, restoration without destroying the integrity of the structure. For data collection, civil buildings located on the territory of Moscow are accepted and pass the Moscow State Examination. According to the long-term experience of passing the relevant instances, it was revealed that the Renovation Fund and the state expertise have comments on the same requirements, which encourages us to consider this stage, systematizing the comments received in order to highlight those aspects that the designer needs to pay more attention to.

Keywords: renovation, weaknesses, stages of passing the examination, systematization of comments, recommendations for reducing the time frame